Page 3 - BV20

Sovereign Britain 3

Sovereign Britain

Un der the crim i nal jus tice sys tem pro posed by the EU lead er ship in
Brussels, known as Cor pus Juris, Brit ain’s his toric free doms and lib -
er ties are to be ended in the name of a new “ef fi cient” Eu rope. It is no
ex ag ger a tion to say that, if im ple mented, the United King dom -- with -
out Ha beas Cor pus and trial by jury -- would in all re al ity be come a
po lice state.

I f a na tion is not sov er eign, the peo ple are slaves. Through out his tory there has never been a na -
tion state which has not, first and fore most, been con cerned with pre serv ing au ton omy. How -
ever, Brit ain is the only coun try with suf fi cient po lit i cal and leg is la tive ma tu rity to have
dis cov ered that the sov er eignty of the in di vid ual is the core of na tional in de pend ence. The two are
inter-de pend ent.

The im po si tion of for eign rule en sures slav ery; the re moval of in di vid ual free doms en sures
dom i nance by an over mighty and ul ti mately self-jus ti fy ing gov ern ment, which need no lon ger pay
lip ser vice to de moc racy. In it self, the lat ter is a form of rule for eign to the Brit ish peo ple.

The im po si tion of Eu ro pean Un ion di rec tives upon the Brit ish peo ple is in clear con tra ven -
tion of the Brit ish con sti tu tion which has de vel oped so as to en sure pro tec tion and se cu rity for the
in di vid ual – who is, and has never been meant to be, at the mercy of tran sient gov ern ment.

In or der to im pose the dic ta tor ship that is the Eu ro pean Un ion upon the Brit ish peo ple, weak
Brit ish gov ern ments, seem ingly bored with the re straints of de moc racy, have treated the free doms
of the peo ple with con tempt. This con tempt is largely man i fested in the whole sale dis re gard for the
con sti tu tion of these is lands; a con sti tu tion which be longs to the Brit ish peo ple and not to the House
of Com mons or the par lia men tary par ties.

The Brit ish way of free dom be gan with the cus toms of An glo-Saxon com mon law, these be -
ing ac cepted in prin ci ple and given spe cific rec og ni tion by The Magna Carta of 1215.

It is im por tant to note that The Magna Carta (1215), as con firmed by Ed ward I in 1297,
can not le gally be ig nored or re pealed by par lia ment – par lia ment is but the means of en act ing
day-to-day gov ern ment and is re strained and re fined in ac tion by the coun ter vail ing dis ci plines
main tained by the con sti tu tion on be half of the Brit ish peo ple, pro tect ing them as in di vid u als. In
par tic u lar, The Magna Carta is a treaty be tween the sub ject and the mon arch. It stands above both
and pro vides a means of re dress if the treaty is ig nored or bro ken by ei ther side. Par lia ment has no
power to amend or re peal it and it re mains in force. In other words, no-one is above the law, whether
King, com moner or in be tween.

The Berean Voice